A. Originality of concept(s):
|
- Is the information wholly or partly new, or mostly familiar?
(If not original, list prior reference under
Comments).
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
|
B. References:
|
- Is related work on this topic adequately recognized,
barely mentioned or neglected?
Recognized
Barely mentioned
Neglected
|
C. Technical soundness:
|
- Is the material consistent and correct; are the conclusions
well supported (Note any errors on the manuscript in
Comments).
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
|
D. Importance of results:
|
- Does the authors explain why this work was done?
Did they explain the relevance to other applications?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
|
E. Clarity of presentation:
|
- Is the manuscript well written, are ideas
well expressed? (Note any unclear passages under Comments
below.)
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
|
F. Organisation of the manuscript:
|
- Is the paper well organised and easy to follow?
Is the topic adequatetly and concisely treated,
or are some sections too brief or too wordy?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
|