We’ve just put three more papers on arXiv.

Earlier in June, Sapna Negi, Paul Buitelaar, and I put “Open Domain Suggestion Mining: Problem Definition and Datasets” on arXiv. In the paper we propose a formal definition for the task of suggestion mining in the context of a wide range of open domain applications. Human perception of the term suggestion is subjective and this effects the preparation of hand labeled datasets for the task of suggestion mining. Existing work either lacks a formal problem definition and annotation procedure, or provides domain and application specific definitions. Moreover, many previously used manually labeled datasets remain proprietary. We first present an annotation study, and based on our observations propose a formal task definition and annotation procedure for creating benchmark datasets for suggestion mining. With this study, we also provide publicly available labeled datasets for suggestion mining in multiple domains. You can find the paper here.

Then, in mid June, Branislav Kveton, Chang Li, Tor Lattimore, Ilya Markov, Csaba Szepesvari, Masrour Zoghi, and I put “BubbleRank: Safe Online Learning to Rerank” on arXiv. We study the problem of online learning to re-rank, where users provide feedback to improve the quality of displayed lists. Learning to rank has been traditionally studied in two settings. In the offline setting, rankers are typically learned from relevance labels of judges. These approaches have become the industry standard. However, they lack exploration, and thus are limited by the information content of offline data. In the online setting, an algorithm can propose a list and learn from the feedback on it in a sequential fashion. Bandit algorithms developed for this setting actively experiment, and in this way overcome the biases of offline data. But they also tend to ignore offline data, which results in a high initial cost of exploration. We propose BubbleRank, a bandit algorithm for re-ranking that combines the strengths of both settings. The algorithm starts with an initial base list and improves it gradually by swapping higher-ranked less attractive items for lower-ranked more attractive items. We prove an upper bound on the n-step regret of BubbleRank that degrades gracefully with the quality of the initial base list. Our theoretical findings are supported by extensive numerical experiments on a large real-world click dataset. The paper can be found here.

And, third, Svitlana Vakulenko, Michael Cochez, Vadim Savenkov, Axel Polleres, and I put “Measuring Semantic Coherence of a Conversation” on arXiv. Conversational systems have become increasingly popular as a way for humans to interact with computers. To be able to provide intelligent responses, conversational systems must correctly model the structure and semantics of a conversation. We introduce the task of measuring semantic (in)coherence in a conversation with respect to background knowledge, which relies on the identification of semantic relations between concepts introduced during a conversation. We propose and evaluate graph-based and machine learning-based approaches for measuring semantic coherence using knowledge graphs, their vector space embeddings and word embedding models, as sources of background knowledge. We demonstrate how these approaches are able to uncover different coherence patterns in conversations on the Ubuntu Dialogue Corpus. The paper can be found here.